Agreguesi i feed

So, Jake Archibald wrote that we should "give footnotes the boot", and... I do not wholly agree. So, here are some arguments against, or at least perpendicular to. Whether this is in grateful thanks of or cold-eyed revenge about him making me drink a limoncello and Red Bull last week can remain a mystery.

Commentary about footnotes on the web tends to boil down into two categories: that they're foot, and that they're notes. Everybody1 agrees that being foot is a problem. Having a meaningless little symbol in some text which you then have to scroll down to the end of a document to understand is stupid. But, and here's the point, nobody does this. Unless a document on the web was straight up machine-converted from its prior life as a printed thing, any "footnotes" therein will have had some effort made to conceptually locate the content of the footnote inline with the text that it's footnoting. That might be a link which jumps you down to the bottom, or it might be placed at the side, or it might appear inline when clicked on, or it might appear in a popover, but the content of a "footnote" can be reached without your thread of attention being diverted from the point where you were previously2.

He's right about the numbers3 being meaningless, though, and that they're bad link text; the number "3" gives no indication of what's hidden behind it, and the analogy with "click here" as link text is a good one. We'll come back to this, but it is a correct objection.

What is a footnote, anyway?

The issue with footnotes being set off this way (that is: that they're notes) isn't, though, that it's bad (which it is), it's that the alternatives are worse, at least in some situations. A footnote is an extra bit of information which is relevant to what you're reading, but not important enough that you need to read it right now. That might be because it's explanatory (that is: it expands and enlarges on the main point being made, but isn't directly required), or because it's a reference (a citation, or a link out to where this information was found so it can be looked up later and to prove that the author didn't just make this up), or because it's commentary (where you don't want to disrupt the text that's written with additions inline, maybe because you didn't write it). Or, and this is important, because it's funnier to set it off like this. A footnote used this way is like the voice of the narrator in The Perils of Penelope Pitstop being funny about the situation. Look, I'll choose a random book from my bookshelf4, Reaper Man by Terry Pratchett.

This is done because it's funny. Alternatives... would not be funny.5

If this read:

Even the industrial-grade crystal ball was only there as a sop to her customers. Mrs Cake could actually read the future in a bowl of porridge. (It would say, for example, that you would shortly undergo a painful bowel movement.) She could have a revelation in a panful of frying bacon.

then it's too distracting, isn't it? That's giving the thing too much prominence; it derails the point and then you have to get back on board after reading it. Similarly with making it a long note via <details> or via making it <section role="aside">, and Jake does make the point that that's for longer notes.

Even the industrial-grade crystal ball was only there as a sop to her customers. Mrs Cake could actually read the future in a bowl of porridge.

NoteIt would say, for example, that you would shortly undergo a painful bowel movement.

She could have a revelation in a panful of frying bacon.

Now, admittedly, half the reason Pratchett's footnotes are funny is because they're imitating the academic use. But the other half is that there is a place for that "voice of the narrator" to make snarky asides, and we don't really have a better way to do it.

Sometimes the parenthesis is the best way to do it. Look at the explanations of "explanatory", "reference", and "commentary" in the paragraph above about what a footnote is. They needed to be inline; the definition of what I mean by "explanatory" should be read along with the word, and you need to understand my definition to understand why I think it's important. It's directly relevant. So it's inline; you must not proceed without having read it. It's not a footnote. But that's not always the case; sometimes you want to expand on what's been written without requiring the reader to read that expansion in order to proceed. It's a help; an addition; something relevant but not too relevant. (I think this is behind the convention that footnotes are in smaller text, personally; it's a typographic convention that this represents the niggling or snarky or helpful "voice in your head", annotating the ongoing conversation. But I haven't backed this up with research or anything.)

What's the alternative?

See, this is the point. Assume for the moment that I'm right6 and that there is some need for this type of annotation -- something which is important enough to be referenced here but not important enough that you must read it to proceed. How do we represent that in a document?

Jake's approaches are all reasonable in some situations. A note section (a "sidebar", I think newspaper people would call it?) works well for long clarifying paragraphs, little biographies of a person you've referenced, or whatever. If that content is less obviously relevant then hiding it behind a collapsed revealer triangle is even better. Short stuff which is that smidge more relevant gets promoted to be entirely inline and put in brackets. Stuff which is entirely reference material (citations, for example) doesn't really need to be in text in the document at all; don't footnote your point and then make a citation which links to the source, just link the text you wrote directly to the source. That certainly is a legacy of print media. There are annoying problems with most of the alternatives (a <details> can't go in a <p> even if inline, which is massively infuriating; sidenotes are great on wide screens but you still need to solve this problem on narrow, so they can't be the answer alone.) You can even put the footnote text in a tooltip as well, which helps people with mouse pointers or (maybe) keyboard navigation, and is what I do right here on this site.

But... if you've got a point which isn't important enough to be inline and isn't long enough to get its own box off to the side, then it's gotta go somewhere, and if that somewhere isn't "right there inline" then it's gotta be somewhere else, and... that's what a footnote is, right? Some text elsewhere that you link to.

We can certainly take advantage of being a digital document to display the annotation inline if the user chooses to (by clicking on it or similar), or to show a popover (which paper can't do). But if the text isn't displayed to you up front, then you have to click on something to show it, and that thing you click on must not itself be distracting. That means the thing you click on must be small, and not contentful. Numbers (or little symbols) are not too bad an approach, in that light. The technical issues here are dispensed with easily enough, as Lea Verou points out: yes, put a bigger hit target around your little undistracting numbers so they're not too hard to tap on, that's important.

But as Lea goes on to say, and Jake mentioned above... how do we deal with the idea that "3" needs to be both "small and undistracting" but also "give context so it's not just a meaningless number"? This is a real problem; pretty much by definition, if your "here is something which will show you extra information" marker gives you context about what that extra information is, then it's long enough that you actually have to read it to understand the context, and therefore it's distracting.7 This isn't really a circle that can be squared: these two requirements are in opposition, and so a compromise is needed.

Lea makes the same point with "How to provide context without increasing prominence? Wrapping part of the text with a link could be a better anchor, but then how to distinguish from actual links? Perhaps we need a convention." And I agree. I think we need a convention for this. But... I think we've already got a convention, no? A little superscript number or symbol means "this is a marker for additional information, which you need to interact with8 to get that additional information". Is it a perfect convention? No: the numbers are semantically meaningless. Is there a better convention? I'm not sure there is.

An end on't

So, Jake's right: a whole bunch of things that are currently presented on the web as "here's a little (maybe clickable) number, click it to jump to the end of the document to read a thing" could be presented much better with a little thought. We web authors could do better at this. But should footnotes go away? I don't think so. Once all the cases of things that should be done better are done better, there'll still be some left. I don't hate footnotes. I do hate limoncello and Red Bull, though.

1. sensible ↩
2. for good implementations, anyway; if you make your footnotes a link down to the end of the document, and then don't provide a link back via either the footnote marker or by adding it to the end, then you are a bad web author and I condemn you to constantly find unpaired socks, forever ↩
3. or, ye gods and little fishes, a selection of mad typographic symbols which most people can't even type and need to be copied from the web search results for "that little squiggly section thingy" ↩
4. alright, I chose a random Terry Pratchett book to make the point, I admit; I'm not stupid. But it really was the closest one to hand; I didn't spend extra time looking for particularly good examples ↩
5. This is basically "explaining the joke", something which squashes all the humour out of it like grapes in a press. Sorry, PTerry. ↩
6. I always do ↩
7. I've seen people do footnote markers which are little words rather than numbers, and it's dead annoying. I get what they're trying to do, which is to solve this context problem, but it's worse ↩
8. you might 'interact' with this marker by clicking on it in a digital document, or by looking it up at the bottom of the page in a print doc, but it's all interaction ↩

So, I’ve been in the job market for a bit over a year. I was part of a layoff cycle in my last company, and finding a new gig has been difficult. I haven’t been able to find something as of yet, but it’s been a learning curve. The market is not what it has been in the last couple of years. With AI in the mix, lots of roles have been eliminated, or have shifted towards where human intervention is needed to interpret or verify the data AI is interpreting. Job hunting is a job in an of itself, and may even take a 9 to 5 role. I know of a lot of people who have gone through the same process as myself, and wanted to share some of insights and tips from what I’ve learned throughout the last year.

Leveraging your network

First, and I think most important, is to understand that there’s a lot of great people around that you might have worked with. You can always ask for recommendations, touch base, or even have a small chat to see how things are going on their end. Conversations can be very refreshing, and can help you get a new perspective as how the industries are shifting, where you might want to learn new skills, or how to improve your positioning in the market. Folks can talk around and see if there’s additional positions where you might be a good fit, and it’s always good to have a helping hand (or a few). At the end of the day, these folks are your own community. I’ve gotten roles in the past by being referred, and these connections have been critical for my understanding of how different businesses may approach the same problem, or even to solve internal conflicts. So, reach out to people you know!

Understanding the market

Like I mentioned in the opening paragraph, the market is evolving constantly. AI has taken a very solid role nowadays, and lots of companies ask about how you’ve used AI recently. Part of understanding the market is understanding the bleeding edge tools that are used to improve workflows and day-to-day efficiency. Research tools that are coming up, and that are shaping the market.

To give you an example. Haven’t tried AI yet? Give it a spin, even for simple questions. Understand where it works, where it fails, and how you, as a human, can make it work for you. Get a sense of the pitfalls, and where human intervention is needed to interpret or verify the data that’s in there. Like one of my former managers said, “trust, but verify”. Or, you can even get to the point of not trusting the data, and sharing that as a story!

Apply thoughtfully

Someone gave me the recommendation to apply to everything that I see where I “could be a fit”. While this might have its upsides, you might also end up in situations where you are not actually a fit, or where you don’t know the company and what it does. Always take the time, at least a few minutes, to understand the company that you’re applying for, research their values, and how they align to yours. Read about the product they’re creating, selling, or offering, and see if it’s a product where you could contribute your skills. Then, you can make the decision of applying. While doing this you may discover that you are applying to a position in a sector that you’re not interested in, or where your skillset might not be used to its full potential. And you might be missing out on some other opportunities that are significantly more aligned to you.

Also take the time to fully review the job description. JDs are pretty descriptive, and you might stumble upon certain details that don’t align with yourself, such as the salary, hours, location, or certain expectations that you might feel don’t fit within the role or that you are not ready for.

Prepare for your interviews

You landed an interview – congratulations! Make sure that you’ve researched the company before heading in. If you’ve taken a look at the company and the role before applying, take a glimpse again. You might find more interesting things, and it will demonstrate that you are actually preparing yourself for the interview. Also, interviewing is a two-way street. Make sure that you have some questions at the end. Double-check the role of your interviewer in the company, and ensure that you have questions that are tailored to their particular roles. Think about what you want to get from the interview (other than the job!).

Job sourcing

There are many great job sources today – LinkedIn being the biggest of all of them. Throughout my searches I’ve also found weworkremotely.com and hnhiring.com are great sources. I strongly advise that you expand your search and find sources that are relevant to your particular role or industry. This has opened up a lot of opportunities for me!

Take some time for yourself

I know that having a job is important. However, it’s also important to take time for yourself. Your mental health is important. You can use this time to develop some skills, play some games, take care of your garden, or even reorganize your home. Find a hobby and distract yourself every now and then. Take breaks, and ensure you’re not over-stressing yourself. Read a bit about burnout, and take care of yourself, as burnout can also happen from job hunting. And if you need a breather, make sure you take one, but don’t overdo it! Time is valuable, so it’s all about finding the right balance.

Hopefully this is helpful for some folks that are going through my same situation. What other things have worked for you? Do you have any other tips you could share? I’d be happy to read about them! Share them with me on LinkedIn. I’m also happy to chat – you can always find me at jose@ubuntu.com.

This isn’t a tech-related post, so if you’re only here for the tech, feel free to skip over.

Any of y’all hate spiders? If you had asked me that last week, I would have said “no”. Turns out you just need to get in a fight with the wrong spider to change that. I’m in the central United States, so thankfully I don’t have to deal with the horror spiders places like Australia have. But even in my not-intrinsically-hostile-to-human-life area of the world, we have some horror spiders of our own turns out. The two most common ones (the Brown Recluse and Black Widow) are basically memes at this point because they get mentioned so often; I’ve been bitten by both so far. The Brown Recluse bite wasn’t really that dramatic before, during, or after treatment, so there’s not really a story to tell there. The Black Widow bite on the other hand… oh boy. Holy moly.

I woke up last Saturday since the alternative was to sleep for 24 hours straight and that sounded awful. There’s lots of good things to do with a Sabbath, why waste the day on sleep? Usually I spend (or at least am supposed to spend) this day with my family, generally doing Bible study and board games. Over the last few weeks though, I had been using the time to clean up various areas of the house that needed it, and this time I decided to clean up a room that had been flooded some time back. I entered the Room of Despair, with the Sword of Paper Towels in one hand and the Shield of Trash Bags in the other. In front of me stood the vast armies of UghYuck-Hai. (LotR fans will get the joke.1) Convinced that I was effectively invulnerable to anything the hoards could do to me, I entered the fray, and thus was the battle joined in the land of MyHome.

Fast forward two hours of sorting, scrubbing, and hauling. I had made a pretty decent dent in the mess. I was also pretty tired at that point, and our family’s dog needed me to take him outside, so I decided it was time to take a break. I put the leash on the dog, and headed into the great outdoors for a much-needed breath of fresh air.

It was at about that time I realized there was something that felt weird on my left hip. In my neck of the woods, we have to deal with pretty extreme concentrations of mosquitoes, so I figured I probably just had some of my blood repurposed by a flying mini-vampire. Upon closer inspection though, I didn’t see localized swelling indicating a mosquito bite (or any other bite for that matter). The troubled area was just far enough toward my back that I couldn’t see if it had a bite hole or not, and I didn’t notice any kind of discoloration to give me a heads-up either. All I knew is that there was a decent-sized patch of my left hip that HURT if I poked it lightly. I’d previously had random areas of my body hurt when poked (probably from minor bruises), so I just lumped this event in with the rest of the mystery injuries I’ve been through and went on with my day.

Upon coming back from helping the dog out, I still felt pretty winded. I chalked that up to doing strenuous work in an area with bad air for too long, and decided to spend some time in bed to recover. One hour in bed turned into two. Two turned into three. Regardless of how long I laid there, I still just felt exhausted. “Did I really work that hard?”, I wondered. It didn’t seem like I had done enough work to warrant this level of tiredness. Thankfully I did get to chat with my mom about Bible stuff for a good portion of that time, so I thought the day had been pretty successful nonetheless.

The sun went down. I was still unreasonably tired. Usually this was when me and my mom would play a board game together, but I just wasn’t up for it. I ended up needing to use the restroom, so I went to do that, and that’s when I noticed my now-even-sorer hip wasn’t the only thing that was wrong.

While in the restroom, I felt like my digestive system was starting to get sick. This too was pretty easily explainable, I had just worked in filth and probably got exposed to too much yuck for my system to handle. My temperature was a bit higher than normal. Whatever, not like I hadn’t had fevers before. My head felt sore and stuffed up, which again just felt like I was getting sick in general. My vision also wasn’t great, but for all I know that could have just been because I was focusing more on feeling bad and less on the wall of the bathroom I was looking at. At this point, I didn’t think that the sore hip and the sudden onset fever might be related.

After coming out of the bathroom, I huddled in bed to try to help the minor fever burn out whatever crud I had gotten into. My mom came to help take care of me while I was sick. To my surprise, the fever didn’t stay minor for long - I suddenly started shivering like crazy even though I wasn’t even remotely cold. My temperature skyrocketed, getting to the point where I was worried it could be dangerously high. I started aching all over and my muscles felt like they got a lot weaker. My heart started pounding furiously, and I felt short of breath. We always keep colloidal silver in the house since it helps with immunity, so my mom gave me some sprays of it and had me hold it under my tongue. I noticed I was salivating a bunch for absolutely no reason while trying to hold the silver spray there as long as I could. Things weren’t really improving, and I noticed my hip was starting to hurt more. I mentioned the sore hip issue to my mom, and we chose to put some aloe vera lotion and colloidal silver on it, just in case I had been bitten by a spider of some sort.

That turned out to be a very good, very very VERY painful idea. After rubbing in the lotion, the bitten area started experiencing severe, relentless stabbing pains, gradually growing in intensity as time progressed. For the first few minutes, I was thinking “wow, this really hurts, what in the world bit me?”, but that pretty quickly gave way to “AAAAA! AAAAA! AAAAAAAAAAAAAA!” I kept most of the screaming in my mind, but after a while it got so bad I just rocked back and forth and groaned for what felt like forever. I’d never had pain like this just keep going and going, so I thought if I just toughed it out for long enough it would eventually go away. This thing didn’t seem to work like that though. After who-knows-how-long, I finally realized this wasn’t going to go away on its own, and so, for reasons only my pain-deranged mind could understand, I tried rolling over on my left side to see if squishing the area would get it to shut up. Beyond all logic, that actually seemed to work, so I just stayed there for quite some time.

At this point, my mom realized the sore hip and the rest of my sickness might be related (I never managed to put the two together). The symptoms I had originally looked like scarlet fever plus random weirdness, but they turned out to match extremely well with the symptoms of a black widow bite (I didn’t have the sweating yet but that ended up happening too). The bite area also started looking discolored, so something was definitely not right. At about this point my kidneys started hurting pretty badly, not as badly as the bite but not too far from it.

I’ll try to go over the rest of the mess relatively quickly. In summary:

• I passed out and fell over while trying to walk back from the restroom at one point. From what I remember, I had started blacking out while in the restroom, realized I needed to get back to bed ASAP, managed to clumsily walk out of the bathroom and most of the way into the bed, then felt myself fall, bump into a lamp, and land on the bed back-first (which was weird, my back wasn’t facing the bed yet). My mom on the other hand, who was not virtually unconscious, reports that I came around the corner, proceeded to fall face first into the lamp with arms outstretched like a zombie, had a minor seizure, and she had to pull me off the lamp and flip me around. All I can think is my brain must have still been active but lost all sensory input and motor control.

• I couldn’t get out of bed for over 48 hours straight thereafter. I’d start blacking out if I tried to stand up for very long.

• A dime-sized area around the bite turned purple, then black. So, great, I guess I can now say a part of me is dead :P At this point we were also able to clearly see dual fang marks, confirming that this was indeed a spider bite.

• I ended up drinking way more water than usual. I usually only drink three or four cups a day, but I drank more like nine or ten cups the day after the bite.

• I had some muscle paralysis that made it difficult to urinate. Thankfully that went away after a day.

• My vision got very, very blurry, and my eyes had tons of pus coming out of them for no apparent reason. This was more of an annoyance than anything, I was keeping my eyes shut most of the time anyway, but the crud kept drying and gluing my eyes shut! It was easy enough to just pick off when that happened, but it was one of those things that makes you go “come on, really?”

• On the third day of recovery, my whole body broke out in a rash that looked like a bunch of purple freckles. They didn’t hurt, didn’t bump up, didn’t even hardly itch, but they looked really weird. Patches of the rash proceeded to go away and come back every so often, which they’re still doing now.

• I ended up missing three days of work while laid up.

We kept applying peppermint oil infused aloe vera lotion and colloidal silver to the bite, which helped reduce pain (well, except for the first time anyway :P) and seems to have helped keep the toxins from spreading too much.

A couple of questions come to mind at this point. For one, how do I know that it was a black widow that bit me? Unfortunately, I never saw or felt the spider, so I can’t know for an absolute certainty that I was bitten by a black widow (some people report false widows can cause similar symptoms if they inject you with enough venom). But false widows don’t live anywhere even remotely close to where I live, and black widows are both known to live here and we’ve seen them here before. The symptoms certainly aren’t anything remotely close to a brown recluse bite, and while I am not a medical professional, they seem to match the symptoms of black widow bites very, very well. So even if by some chance this wasn’t a black widow, whatever bit me had just as bad of an effect on me as a black widow would have.

For two, why didn’t I go to a hospital? Number one, everything I looked up said the most they could do is give you antivenom (which can cause anaphylaxis, no thank you), or painkillers like fentanyl (which I don’t want anywhere near me, I’d rather feel like I’m dying from a spider bite than take a narcotic painkiller, thanks anyway). Number two, last time a family member had to go to the hospital, the ambulance just about killed him trying to get him there in the first place. I lost most of my respect for my city’s medical facilities that day; if I’m not literally dying, I don’t need a hospital, and if I am dying, my hospitals will probably just kill me off quicker.

I’m currently on day 4 of recovery (including the day I was bitten). I’m still lightheaded, but I can stand without passing out finally. The kidney pain went away, as did the stabbing pain in the bite area (though it still aches a bit, and hurts if you poke it). The fever is mostly gone, my eyes are working normally again and aren’t constantly trying to superglue themselves closed, and my breathing is mostly fine again. I’m definitely still feeling the effects of the bite, but they aren’t crippling anymore. I’ll probably be able to work from home in the morning (I’d try to do household chores too but my mom would probably have a heart attack since I just about killed myself trying to get out of the bathroom).

Speaking of working from home, it’s half past midnight here, I should be going to bed. Thanks for reading!

1

The army of Saruman sent against the fortress of Helm’s Deep was made up of half-elven, half-orc creatures known as Uruk-Hai. “Ugh, yuck!” and “Uruk” sounded humorously similar, so I just went with it.

The Internet has changed a lot in the last 40+ years. Fads have come and gone. Network protocols have been designed, deployed, adopted, and abandoned. Industries have come and gone. The types of people on the internet have changed a lot. The number of people on the internet has changed a lot, creating an information medium unlike anything ever seen before in human history. There’s a lot of good things about the Internet as of 2025, but there’s also an inescapable hole in what it used to be, for me.

I miss being able to throw a site up to send around to friends to play with without worrying about hordes of AI-feeding HTML combine harvesters DoS-ing my website, costing me thousands in network transfer for the privilege. I miss being able to put a lightly authenticated game server up and not worry too much at night – wondering if that process is now mining bitcoin. I miss being able to run a server in my home closet. Decades of cat and mouse games have rendered running a mail server nearly impossible. Those who are “brave” enough to try are met with weekslong stretches of delivery failures and countless hours yelling ineffectually into a pipe that leads from the cheerful lobby of some disinterested corporation directly into a void somewhere 4 layers below ground level.

I miss the spirit of curiosity, exploration, and trying new things. I miss building things for fun without having to worry about being too successful, after which “security” offices start demanding my supplier paperwork in triplicate as heartfelt thanks from their engineering teams. I miss communities that are run because it is important to them, not for ad revenue. I miss community operated spaces and having more than four websites that are all full of nothing except screenshots of each other.

Every other page I find myself on now has an AI generated click-bait title, shared for rage-clicks all brought-to-you-by-our-sponsors–completely covered wall-to-wall with popup modals, telling me how much they respect my privacy, with the real content hidden at the bottom bracketed by deceptive ads served by companies that definitely know which new coffee shop I went to last month.

This is wrong, and those who have seen what was know it.

I can’t keep doing it. I’m not doing it any more. I reject the notion that this is as it needs to be. It is wrong. The hole left in what the Internet used to be must be filled. I will fill it.

What comes before part b?

Throughout the 2000s, some of my favorite memories were from LAN parties at my friends’ places. Dragging your setup somewhere, long nights playing games, goofing off, even building software all night to get something working—being able to do something fiercely technical in the context of a uniquely social activity. It wasn’t really much about the games or the projects—it was an excuse to spend time together, just hanging out. A huge reason I learned so much in college was that campus was a non-stop LAN party – we could freely stand up servers, talk between dorms on the LAN, and hit my dorm room computer from the lab. Things could go from individual to social in the matter of seconds. The Internet used to work this way—my dorm had public IPs handed out by DHCP, and my workstation could serve traffic from anywhere on the internet. I haven’t been back to campus in a few years, but I’d be surprised if this were still the case.

In December of 2021, three of us got together and connected our houses together in what we now call The Promised LAN. The idea is simple—fill the hole we feel is gone from our lives. Build our own always-on 24/7 nonstop LAN party. Build a space that is intrinsically social, even though we’re doing technical things. We can freely host insecure game servers or one-off side projects without worrying about what someone will do with it.

Over the years, it’s evolved very slowly—we haven’t pulled any all-nighters. Our mantra has become “old growth”, building each layer carefully. As of May 2025, the LAN is now 19 friends running around 25 network segments. Those 25 networks are connected to 3 backbone nodes, exchanging routes and IP traffic for the LAN. We refer to the set of backbone operators as “The Bureau of LAN Management”. Combined decades of operating critical infrastructure has driven The Bureau to make a set of well-understood, boring, predictable, interoperable and easily debuggable decisions to make this all happen. Nothing here is exotic or even technically interesting.

Applications of trusting trust

The hardest part, however, is rejecting the idea that anything outside our own LAN is untrustworthy—nearly irreversible damage inflicted on us by the Internet. We have solved this by not solving it. We strictly control membership—the absolute hard minimum for joining the LAN requires 10 years of friendship with at least one member of the Bureau, with another 10 years of friendship planned. Members of the LAN can veto new members even if all other criteria is met. Even with those strict rules, there’s no shortage of friends that meet the qualifications—but we are not equipped to take that many folks on. It’s hard to join—-both socially and technically. Doing something malicious on the LAN requires a lot of highly technical effort upfront, and it would endanger a decade of friendship. We have relied on those human, social, interpersonal bonds to bring us all together. It’s worked for the last 4 years, and it should continue working until we think of something better.

We assume roommates, partners, kids, and visitors all have access to The Promised LAN. If they’re let into our friends' network, there is a level of trust that works transitively for us—I trust them to be on mine. This LAN is not for “security”, rather, the network border is a social one. Benign “hacking”—in the original sense of misusing systems to do fun and interesting things—is encouraged. Robust ACLs and firewalls on the LAN are, by definition, an interpersonal—not technical—failure. We all trust every other network operator to run their segment in a way that aligns with our collective values and norms.

Over the last 4 years, we’ve grown our own culture and fads—around half of the people on the LAN have thermal receipt printers with open access, for printing out quips or jokes on each other’s counters. It’s incredible how much network transport and a trusting culture gets you—there’s a 3-node IRC network, exotic hardware to gawk at, radios galore, a NAS storage swap, LAN only email, and even a SIP phone network of “redphones”.

DIY

We do not wish to, nor will we, rebuild the internet. We do not wish to, nor will we, scale this. We will never be friends with enough people, as hard as we may try. Participation hinges on us all having fun. As a result, membership will never be open, and we will never have enough connected LANs to deal with the technical and social problems that start to happen with scale. This is a feature, not a bug.

This is a call for you to do the same. Build your own LAN. Connect it with friends’ homes. Remember what is missing from your life, and fill it in. Use software you know how to operate and get it running. Build slowly. Build your community. Do it with joy. Remember how we got here. Rebuild a community space that doesn’t need to be mediated by faceless corporations and ad revenue. Build something sustainable that brings you joy. Rebuild something you use daily.

Bring back what we’re missing.

https://medium.com/media/553e1df568153a684bfe861e27692fcb/href

A gentleman by the name of Arif Ali reached out to me on LinkedIn. I won’t share the actual text of the message, but I’ll paraphrase:
“I hope everything is going well with you. I’m applying to be an Ubuntu ‘Per Package Uploader’ for the SOS package, and I was wondering if you could endorse my application.”

Arif, thank you! I have always appreciated our chats, and I truly believe you’re doing great work. I don’t want to interfere with anything by jumping on the wiki, but just know you have my full backing.

“So, who actually lets Arif upload new versions of SOS to Ubuntu, and what is it?”
Great question!

Firstly, I realized that I needed some more info on what SOS is, so I can explain it to you all. On a quick search, this was the first result.

Okay, so genuine question…

Why does the first DuckDuckGo result for “sosreport” point to an article for a release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux that is two versions old? In other words, hey DuckDuckGo, your grass is starting to get long. Or maybe Red Hat? Can’t tell, I give you both the benefit of the doubt, in good faith.

So, I clarified the search and found this. Canonical, you’ve done a great job. Red Hat, you could work on your SEO so I can actually find the RHEL 10 docs quicker, but hey… B+ for effort. ;)

Anyway, let me tell you about Arif. Just from my own experiences.

He’s incredible. He shows love to others, and whenever I would sponsor one of his packages during my time in Ubuntu, he was always incredibly receptive to feedback. I really appreciate the way he reached out to me, as well. That was really kind, and to be honest, I needed it.

As for character, he has my +1. In terms of the members of the DMB (aside from one person who I will not mention by name, who has caused me immense trouble elsewhere), here’s what I’d tell you if you asked me privately…

“It’s just PPU. Arif works on SOS as part of his job. Please, do still grill him. The test, and ensuring people know that they actually need to pass a test to get permissions, that’s pretty important.”

That being said, I think he deserves it.

Good luck, Arif. I wish you well in your meeting. I genuinely hope this helps. :)

And to my friends in Ubuntu, I miss you. Please reach out. I’d be happy to write you a public letter, too. Only if you want. :)

Theodore Roosevelt is someone I have admired for a long time. I especially appreciate what has been coined the Man in the Arena speech.

A specific excerpt comes to mind after reading world news over the last twelve hours:

“It is well if a large proportion of the leaders in any republic, in any democracy, are, as a matter of course, drawn from the classes represented in this audience to-day; but only provided that those classes possess the gifts of sympathy with plain people and of devotion to great ideals. You and those like you have received special advantages; you have all of you had the opportunity for mental training; many of you have had leisure; most of you have had a chance for enjoyment of life far greater than comes to the majority of your fellows. To you and your kind much has been given, and from you much should be expected. Yet there are certain failings against which it is especially incumbent that both men of trained and cultivated intellect, and men of inherited wealth and position should especially guard themselves, because to these failings they are especially liable; and if yielded to, their- your- chances of useful service are at an end. Let the man of learning, the man of lettered leisure, beware of that queer and cheap temptation to pose to himself and to others as a cynic, as the man who has outgrown emotions and beliefs, the man to whom good and evil are as one. The poorest way to face life is to face it with a sneer. There are many men who feel a kind of twister pride in cynicism; there are many who confine themselves to criticism of the way others do what they themselves dare not even attempt. There is no more unhealthy being, no man less worthy of respect, than he who either really holds, or feigns to hold, an attitude of sneering disbelief toward all that is great and lofty, whether in achievement or in that noble effort which, even if it fails, comes to second achievement. A cynical habit of thought and speech, a readiness to criticise work which the critic himself never tries to perform, an intellectual aloofness which will not accept contact with life’s realities — all these are marks, not as the possessor would fain to think, of superiority but of weakness. They mark the men unfit to bear their part painfully in the stern strife of living, who seek, in the affection of contempt for the achievements of others, to hide from others and from themselves in their own weakness. The rôle is easy; there is none easier, save only the rôle of the man who sneers alike at both criticism and performance.”

The riots in LA are seriously concerning to me. If something doesn’t happen soon, this is going to get out of control.

If you are participating in these events, or know someone who is, tell them to calm down. Physical violence is never the answer, no matter your political party.

De-escalate immediately.

Be well. Show love to one another!

What is Bazaar code hosting?

Bazaar is a distributed revision control system, originally developed by Canonical. It provides similar functionality compared to the now dominant Git.

Bazaar code hosting is an offering from Launchpad to both provide a Bazaar backend for hosting code, but also a web frontend for browsing the code. The frontend is provided by the Loggerhead application on Launchpad.

Sunsetting Bazaar

Bazaar passed its peak a decade ago. Breezy is a fork of Bazaar that has kept a form of Bazaar alive, but the last release of Bazaar was in 2016. Since then the impact has declined, and there are modern replacements like Git.

Just keeping Bazaar running requires a non-trivial amount of development, operations time, and infrastructure resources – all of which could be better used elsewhere.

Launchpad will now begin the process of discontinuing support for Bazaar.

Timelines

We are aware that the migration of the repositories and updating workflows will take some time, that is why we planned sunsetting in two phases.

Phase 1

Loggerhead, the web frontend, which is used to browse the code in a web browser, will be shut down imminently. Analyzing access logs showed that there are hardly any more requests from legit users, but almost the entire traffic comes from scrapers and other abusers. Sunsetting Loggerhead will not affect the ability to pull, push and merge changes.

Phase 2

From September 1st, 2025, we do not intend to have Bazaar, the code hosting backend, any more. Users need to migrate all repositories from Bazaar to Git between now and this deadline.

Migration paths

The following blog post describes all the necessary steps on how to convert a Bazaar repository hosted on Launchpad to Git.

Migrate a Repository From Bazaar to Git Call for action

Our users are extremely important to us. Ubuntu, for instance, has a long history of Bazaar usage, and we will need to work with the Ubuntu Engineering team to find ways to move forward to remove the reliance on the integration with Bazaar for the development of Ubuntu. If you are also using Bazaar and you have a special use case, or you do not see a clear way forward, please reach out to us to discuss your use case and how we can help you.

You can reach us in #launchpad:ubuntu.com on Matrix, or submit a question or send us an e-mail via feedback@launchpad.net.

It is also recommended to join the ongoing discussion at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phasing-out-bazaar-code-hosting/62189.

It’s amazing how quickly public opinion changes. Or, how quickly
people cave. Remember just 10 years ago, how people felt about
google glass?

• https://www.businessinsider.com/i-was-assaulted-for-wearing-google-glass-2014-4
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8coAuWZL20

Or how they felt when they found out target was analyzing their
purchases and perhaps knew them better than themselves or their
family?

• https://techland.time.com/2012/02/17/how-target-knew-a-high-school-girl-was-pregnant-before-her-parents/
• https://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2012/02/16/how-target-figured-out-a-teen-girl-was-pregnant-before-her-father-did/

People used to worry about being tracked by companies and government.
Today, they feel insecure unless they are certain they are being
tracked. For their own well-being of course. If an online store does
*not* send an email 10 hours after you’ve “left items in your cart,
don’t miss out!”, and another the next day, you feel disappointed. I
believe they’re now seen as sub-par.

As you may recall from previous posts and elsewhere I have been busy writing a new solver for APT. Today I want to share some of the latest changes in how to approach solving.

The idea for the solver was that manually installed packages are always protected from removals – in terms of SAT solving, they are facts. Automatically installed packages become optional unit clauses. Optional clauses are solved after manual ones, they don’t partake in normal unit propagation.

This worked fine, say you had

A # install request for A B # manually installed, keep it A depends on: conflicts-B | C

Installing A on a system with B installed installed C, as it was not allowed to install the conflicts-B package since B is installed.

However, I also introduced a mode to allow removing manually installed packages, and that’s where it broke down, now instead of B being a fact, our clauses looked like:

A # install request for A A depends on: conflicts-B | C Optional: B # try to keep B installed

As a result, we installed conflicts-B and removed B; the steps the solver takes are:

1. A is a fact, mark it
2. A depends on: conflicts-B | C is the strongest clause, try to install conflicts-B
3. We unit propagate that conflicts-B conflicts with B, so we mark not B
4. Optional: B is reached, but not satisfiable, ignore it because it’s optional.

This isn’t correct: Just because we allow removing manually installed packages doesn’t mean that we should remove manually installed packages if we don’t need to.

Fixing this turns out to be surprisingly easy. In addition to adding our optional (soft) clauses, let’s first assume all of them!

But to explain how this works, we first need to explain some terminology:

1. The solver operates on a stack of decisions
2. “enqueue” means a fact is being added at the current decision level, and enqueued for propagation
3. “assume” bumps the decision level, and then enqueues the assumed variable
4. “propagate” looks at all the facts and sees if any clause becomes unit, and then enqueues it
5. “unit” is when a clause has a single literal left to assign

To illustrate this in pseudo Python code:

1. We introduce all our facts, and if they conflict, we are unsat:

   for fact in facts: enqueue(fact) if not propagate(): return False

2. For each optional literal, we register a soft clause and assume it. If the assumption fails, we ignore it. If it succeeds, but propagation fails, we undo the assumption.

   for optionalLiteral in optionalLiterals: registerClause(SoftClause([optionalLiteral])) if assume(optionalLiteral) and not propagate(): undo()

3. Finally we enter the main solver loop:

   while True: if not propagate(): if not backtrack(): return False elif <all clauses are satisfied>: return True elif it := find("best unassigned literal satisfying a hard clause"): assume(it) elif it := find("best literal satisfying a soft clause"): assume(it)

The key point to note is that the main loop will undo the assumptions in order; so if you assume A,B,C and B is not possible, we will have also undone C. But since C is also enqueued as a soft clause, we will then later find it again:

1. Assume A: State=[Assume(A)], Clauses=[SoftClause([A])]
2. Assume B: State=[Assume(A),Assume(B)], Clauses=[SoftClause([A]),SoftClause([B])]
3. Assume C: State=[Assume(A),Assume(B),Assume(C)], Clauses=[SoftClause([A]),SoftClause([B]),SoftClause([C])]
4. Solve finds a conflict, backtracks, and sets not C: State=[Assume(A),Assume(B),not(C)]
5. Solve finds a conflict, backtracks, and sets not B: State=[Assume(A),not(B)] – C is no longer assumed either
6. Solve, assume C as it satisfies SoftClause([C]) as next best literal: State=[Assume(A),not(B),Assume(C)]
7. All clauses are satisfied, solution is A, not B, and C.

This is not (correct) MaxSAT, because we actually do not guarantee that we satisfy as many soft clauses as possible. Consider you have the following clauses:

Optional: A Optional: B Optional: C B Conflicts with A C Conflicts with A

There are two possible results here:

1. {A} – If we assume A first, we are unable to satisfy B or C.
2. {B,C} – If we assume either B or C first, A is unsat.

The question to ponder though is whether we actually need a global maximum or whether a local maximum is satisfactory in practice for a dependency solver If you look at it, a naive MaxSAT solver needs to run the SAT solver 2**n times for n soft clauses, whereas our heuristic only needs n runs.

For dependency solving, it seems we do not seem have a strong need for a global maximum: There are various other preferences between our literals, say priorities; and empirically, from evaluating hundreds of regressions without the initial assumptions, I can say that the assumptions do fix those cases and the result is correct.

Further improvements exist, though, and we can look into them if they are needed, such as:

• Use a better heuristic:

  If we assume 1 clause and solve, and we cause 2 or more clauses to become unsatisfiable, then that clause is a local minimum and can be skipped. This is a more common heuristical MaxSAT solver. This gives us a better local maximum, but not a global one.

  This is more or less what the Smart package manager did, except that in Smart, all packages were optional, and the entire solution was scored. It calculated a basic solution without optimization and then toggled each variable and saw if the score improved.

• Implement an actual search for a global maximum:

  This involves reading the literature. There are various versions of this, for example:

  1. Find unsatisfiable cores and use those to guide relaxation of clauses.

  2. A bounds-based search, where we translate sum(satisifed clauses) > k into SAT, and then search in one of the following ways:

     1. from 0 upward
     2. from n downward
     3. perform a binary search on [0, k] satisfied clauses.

     Actually we do not even need to calculate sum constraints into CNF, because we can just add a specialized new type of constraint to our code.