Agreguesi i feed

According to The Information (paywalled), a state-backed Shanghai company has begun mass-producing China's first homegrown immersion DUV lithography machines, with about five units expected this year for SMIC, Hua Hong, and CXMT. Roughly 20 more units are expected in 2027. Tom's Hardware reports: The Information didn't name the manufacturer, but its sources described the operation as having pulled DUV development teams from several Chinese companies, one of them the state-backed startup Shanghai Yuliangsheng Technology. SMIC has been testing a Yuliangsheng immersion tool since September 2025. Most components in the new systems are domestic, though some critical parts still come from Japan, and delays at local suppliers have held back output this year. [...] China accounts for around 20% of ASML's net sales this year, down from 33% in 2025, driven mainly by mainstream logic demand... Independent analysis from the AI Futures Project in June put commercial-scale Chinese immersion DUV in the mid-2030s, with ASML holding 98.7% of the immersion market. Qualifying the new machines for production lines could take many months, and they trail ASML's tools on performance and build quality. China's domestic EUV effort, which Reuters first reported as a working prototype in December, remains years away.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: OpenAI's ChatGPT is now refusing requests to generate text that directly mimics the style of famous authors. When asked to do so, the popular LLM instead offers a response that draws on the "broad qualities" of those authors "while remaining distinct in its own voice," for example. This morning, Ars received the following response to a test prompt asking for a story introduction in the style of Stephen King: "I can definitely write with the hallmarks of atmospheric, character-driven horror and small-town dread, but I can't write in Stephen King's exact style or closely imitate his distinctive voice. Here's an original opening that captures a similar feeling while remaining its own..." In testing, ChatGPT generated similar dodges for other authors both living (J.K. Rowling, Amy Tan) and dead (Charles Dickens, Ernest Hemingway). An analysis published by No Latency earlier this month (PDF) found the same behavior for living authors but found ChatGPT complied with style-copying requests for deceased authors. In refusing to directly copy the "exact style" of various authors, ChatGPT offered instead to capture an overall "feeling" by incorporating some of the common features found in those authors' work. That may seem like a distinction without a real difference at first glance. But the slight alteration could be legally important as OpenAI continues to fight a number of lawsuits brought by book authors alleging large-scale copyright infringement by models trained on their work. One of those suits specifically cites ChatGPT's "uncanny ability to generate text similar to that found in copyrighted textual materials," for instance. An OpenAI spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment from Ars Technica. In the US, copyright law generally protects only a specific expression of an idea, not the more intangible style of an author. But an AI-generated stylistic imitation could become infringing if it becomes "substantially similar" to the work of the original author. "We've never had a situation in which this personal style of individual creators could be imitated as well and as inexpensively as we now have with AI," George Washington University Law School Professor Robert Brauneis told Bloomberg Law.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

MacRumors interviewed AI critic Ed Zitron, author of the Where's Your Ed At newsletter and host of the Better Offline podcast, about what could happen to Apple if the costly AI infrastructure boom collapses. Zitron argued that Apple is relatively well insulated because it has spent far less on data centers than rivals such as Microsoft, Google, and Amazon. He said the company could use the downturn to make selective acquisitions, though it might simply continue operating largely as before. "I think they will sit on the sidelines and watch everything burn," Zitron said. Here's an excerpt from the report: If the bubble deflates the way you expect (write-downs, too much compute supply, possibly OpenAI cratering), can you walk us through what that would actually look like for Apple? Does anything break for iPhone users, or does Apple mostly watch it happen from the sidelines? Could it even benefit Apple? I think things would look much the same for Apple. I think they will sit on the sidelines and watch everything burn. I could see them doing some choice acquisitions as things begin to collapse, but I could also see them do nothing. I think Apple is in a very weird place at the moment. The Vision Pro was a dud, but it was also the most interesting and future-forward thing I've seen anyone put out in a while. If they were smart, they'd tread water and sink as much money into making that as small as humanely possible -- no matter how long it takes -- because the entire AI bubble is a result of everybody running out of hypergrowth ideas, mostly because we're flat out of new interfaces. I want to be clear that what they want to do with the Vision Pro requires it to basically be weightless and invisible and never need adjustments. When it works, it's genuinely awesome. But that's a load-bearing when. One slight movement means the whole thing goes out of focus. I can't even use mine anymore because it needs an update that requires you to wear the thing the whole time. So much promise, released too early, shoved out the door by a CEO on his way out.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

There are several reasons why Linux has such a good reputation and has become such a good standard across the world. It is the power behind most internet servers and cloud infrastructures as well as billions of Android devices. It is stable, has consistently high-performance levels, and remains very flexible. You don’t have to deal with expensive licenses, can view and share code, and can customize any part of the interface to suit your demands. In an age of data breaches and continuous malwa...

Version:next-20260727 (linux-next) Released:2026-07-27

European misinformation researchers say TikTok, X, and Meta are obstructing access to platform data required under the EU's Digital Services Act through rejections, restrictive quotas, costly APIs, and burdensome security demands. Although regulators have fined X and pushed platforms to improve access, researchers remain skeptical that the changes will provide reliable, reproducible data at scale. Ars Technica reports: In recent years, social media companies shut down public access tools like Meta's CrowdTangle and replaced them with content libraries, or, like X, paywalled their API data, forcing academics to pay "hundreds of dollars a month," said Duncan Allen, a research officer at Democracy Reporting International (DRI) in Germany. Researchers say that without API access, what Iamnitchi describes as the "black holes" in what society knows about how these platforms recommend content or handle reports regarding sensitive content will only grow. Others, like TikTok, cap how many posts any researcher account can pull each day, which Allen said can make it "impossible to study anything at scale." The DSA was meant to solve this by allowing vetted researchers at credible institutions to have access to API data if they could show it would help in studying systemic risks, from illegal content to threats to fundamental rights. But two years after the law took effect, researchers say they struggle to meet its security requirements and face narrow interpretations from platforms of what qualifies as a systemic risk. Application forms differ by platform, but most require data to be stored on infrastructure that cannot be compromised -- such as a machine physically disconnected from the Internet -- a resource most universities lack, [said Adriana Iamnitchi, chair of computational social sciences at Maastricht University in the Netherlands, who leads research into online disinformation campaigns.] Even for researchers who secure approval, "there's no guarantee that the data is good," said L. K. Seiling, coordinator of the DSA40 Collaboratory, a German initiative that tracks 46 DSA applications. API data is often difficult for a colleague to reproduce, so a researcher's work cannot be checked for errors, which Iamnitchi said is a "basic requirement of science." DSA40 data shows that of 46 tracked applications, 20 were approved and 14 rejected. But approval rates vary widely: TikTok approved 11 of 13 applications, while X rejected 11 of 23. The true rejection rate is likely higher because the tracker relies on voluntary reporting, Seiling said. "There's no structured advantage for researchers to use this pathway," Seiling said. "Data access as it's set up right now tries to disincentivize researchers."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

An administrator reports unusual outbound traffic from a Linux server after firewall logs show repeated connections to an unfamiliar external IP address. Nothing obvious appears in the authentication logs, the web server is running normally, and no high-severity endpoint alerts have fired.

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters: Nvidia is in talks to provide roughly $250 billion in financing guarantees for OpenAI as part of a massive data center project, the Wall Street Journal reported on Sunday. The backstop from Nvidia would help the ChatGPT maker lease a 10-gigawatt project that SoftBank's energy subsidiary is developing in southern Ohio, the newspaper said, citing people familiar with the matter. For OpenAI, a deal would be the first step toward controlling its own infrastructure instead of renting it from Microsoft, Amazon, and Oracle, while for Nvidia, it would guarantee demand for its chips for years to come. The project is expected to cost more than $500 billion in total, including the chips inside the data center, according to the WSJ. The $250 billion guarantee covers the data center lease and debt financing, but would not cover the Nvidia chips inside the center, the WSJ said, adding that the chipmaker was also discussing financing OpenAI's chip purchases worth up to $350 billion. Nvidia's backing would support financing vehicles aimed at reassuring lenders about the project's funding, the report added. The first phase of the project is expected to be finished in 2028, with around 800 megawatts of power, the Journal said. The report notes that the U.S. government will control access to the power, while Japan will fund it separately under a trade agreement tied to Tokyo's $33 billion investment in a natural gas plant. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick will reportedly help determine who receives access.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

For decades, Linux defenders relied on a comfortable assumption: a public security patch did not imply an imminent vulnerability. While open-source openness made vulnerability fixes public to everyone on kernel.org or the Linux Kernel Mailing List (LKML), converting a raw commit into a weaponized exploit took a significant amount of manual effort. This delay, estimated in weeks or months, gave businesses enough time to assess exposure, organize testing windows, and push changes across product...

Accepting file uploads is basically inviting strangers to throw random objects through your front window and hoping your living room furniture catches them. Whether it's profile pictures, PDF invoices, or archive files, handling raw uploads means you're trusting external input to behave.

An anonymous reader shared this report from Phoronix: A patch series that appears destined for the upcoming Linux 7.3 merge window is what's dubbed the "KVM Chainsaw" as a major code clean-up in dealing with the kvm_mmu "god data structure". Red Hat engineer and KVM maintainer Paolo Bonzini has merged the kvm-chainsaw branch to KVM's "next" Git branch. With this KVM Chainsaw work now in the next branch, it should be submitted for the upcoming Linux 7.3 cycle. The KVM Chainsaw work deals with the kvm_mmu structure being overloaded with multiple uses and splits it down into three parts for better handling current KVM usage. Paolo explains of KVM Chainsaw with the merge to the KVM.git next branch: "The kvm_mmu is a "god data structure" that includes three different tasks: describing the guest page table's format, walking the guest page tables and building the page tables. This means that the (already poorly named) nested_mmu is only used in part, since it has no page tables to construct. Furthermore, some parts are reused across guest and host page tables (such as the reserved bits detector) but others are not; for example permission_fault is replaced by simplified code such as is_executable_pte(). This series cleans this up by splitting kvm_mmu in three parts...

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

GUADEC 2026 Group Photo (by Jakub Steiner)

Last week I attended GUADEC in A Coruña, Spain. While I attend the conference every year, this one was extra special because 14 years ago we held the conference at the same location, and it was my first GUADEC ever. Great memories!

Back in 2012, I was an intern in the Google Summer of Code program, traveling abroad for the first time. Now I feel privileged to have spent all the years since then working on the GNOME project as a professional developer. It turned out to be everything (and more) that my younger self had dreamed of.

Now, living in the Czech Republic, my travel this time was quite smooth compared to my first trip to A Coruña. Vienna  -> Madrid -> A Coruña. I managed to leave early in the morning and arrive at the accommodation just in time for the conference’s pre-registration party. Other than the nostalgia of being back in the same Rialta cafeteria, I was super happy to meet some of my long time GNOME friends.

While I stuck to all the talks in the first room, I have now caught up with the room 2 talks via the YouTube recordings. The conference was packed with great desktop content, as always.

On day 1, I would highlight Jakub’s “Symbolic Achievements” regarding the future of our UI icons and Matthias’ recent SVG work. The icon animation work opens up a universe of possibilities for building more polished UIs. At the end of day 1, I went on stage for the “Community Update” session, where I represented the GNOME Settings and the Internship Committee teams.

On day 2, Emmanuele Bassi continued his effort to establish more governance in our project. This inspired me (representing GNOME Settings) and some of the GNOME Shell team to sit down and discuss putting together a Core-Components/System Team. This way, we can collaborate and support each other more effectively across components. As we progress on vertically integrating our desktop experience, our projects become more and more entangled. This requires more and more collaboration and shared responsibilities. We will probably announce this team soon.

Continuing on day 2, Joan presented his progress on passwordless authentication in GDM and Carlos presented an interesting initiative for using Mutter as an application test framework. This could complement other testing methods (such as OpenQA) and help us move away from heavily using the accessibility API for some of our current dogtail-type of UI tests. Additionally, Adrian presented his challenges and ideas for session Save/Restore. This work looks promising and is highly desired by the general audience. This has already been reported on by LWN.

At the end of day 2 I had the chance to present “The Future of Boxes”. A demo of the work I have been doing on the side for the past couple of years to refactor and rewrite Boxes to use a new display widget (libmks), GTK4/libadwaita, and to be a Flatpak-first app. I have a blog post version of this talk coming out in a few days. I’m super excited about the progress I made on this project and how close I feel we are to making it useful for a general audience, just as the “old” Boxes served plenty of users and their workflows.

To wrap up day 2, I hosted our traditional “Intern Lightning Talks” session, where we highlighted the work of our Google Summer of Code interns this season. Two interns managed to attend GUADEC in person, while the other four sent pre-recorded presentations.

Day 3, Saturday, started with a morning-long AGM (the Foundation’s Annual General Meeting). The new format was much more engaging than the ones before. I also would like to praise Allan for doing an excellent job explaining the GNOME Foundation’s processes, finances, and initiatives. After lunch, we watched the traditional “State of the Shell” update from Carlos, Florian, Jonas and Michel. I was also happy to watch Andrea Veri’s update on the state of GNOME Infrastructure, and to learn that our project’s infra is in very good hands during these difficult times.

The local GUADEC organizers put together a lovely dinner experience for everyone. Besides the delicious food and drinks, I spent the night catching up with multiple GNOME friends. This was the same location where we held one of our social events back in 2012. The night sky view of the sea, the fresh air, and the memories were great.

With the three talk days finished, we spent two more days of BoFs/Hackfests. Sunday morning started with my “GNOME Settings BoF”. The session was attended by some well known contributors and also by a few newcomers interested in getting involved or getting answers about the future of our settings. We discussed various topics ranging from the maintenance of some subsystems, AI policy ideas, documentation, and plans for GNOME 51 and 52. I demoed some of my own work-in-progress branches and highlighted what others are working on. I was glad that we received some positive feedback on our recent changes and contributors committed to help review and test some of the work.

At the end of Sunday, I hosted a “GNOME Internship Committee Meetup,” where current and former interns joined Aryan, Maria, and me to discuss how we can improve our internship experience in GNOME. Topics ranged from onboarding and community bonding activities to feedback, etc…

On Sunday evening I went to the Plaza de Maria Pita, the main square in town, to watch the World Cup final between Spain and Argentina. As a football fan, I felt privileged to celebrate this game in the home country of the winning team.

On Monday morning I attended the Design Team BoF, where we discussed various topics, from a transparent topbar in the Shell, to action buttons on dialogs. I started prototyping changes to action dialog buttons for some GNOME Settings dialogs so that the team has something tangible to experiment with. At the end of Monday, my farewell from the conference was participating in the “Engagement Team” BoF. I was happy to see the team getting back in shape again, and how enthusiastic they are. Since I work on Planet GNOME and a couple of other websites, I was happy to help them discuss and develop some ideas for promoting more of our development work through engagement channels (social media accounts, blogs, news reporting, etc…).

On Tuesday, July 21, I flew back home through Barcelona and then Vienna (which is a couple of hours drive from where I live in the Czech countryside).

All in all, I would like to thank the GUADEC organizers for another unforgettable conference, the GNOME community for always raising the bar on the conference’s content, and Red Hat for funding my trip and accommodation in Spain.

I am looking forward to seeing you all next year!

"The rise of TikTok, Instagram Reels and Amazon storefronts has created a new kind of white-collar exit strategy," reports Bloomberg. Workers ditch office jobs not to become celebrities, necessarily, "but to piece together an income online through brand deals, affiliate links and highly personal videos documenting everyday life." In many cases, the followers necessary to sustain a living are smaller (and more attainable) than people might assume. A small but loyal audience can now generate enough income to rival a midlevel salary. Welcome to the middle-class creator economy. Last year, 25-year-old Abi Platock balanced a corporate marketing job in New York while posting online in her spare time. She built her audience by posting one or two videos a day, offering career advice, beauty tips and daily vlogs. "I signed my first brand deal in the four-figure range, and for me that was just such a big eye-opening moment," Platock says of her partnership with deodorant brand Secret. She had 8,000 followers on TikTok at the time. "You can totally make it work without having hundreds of thousands of followers." Platock, who now has roughly 25,000 followers across platforms, has signed about $25,000 in brand deals so far this year and expects her annual creator income to reach around $50,000 by yearend. Her experience reflects a broader shift in advertising. Brands are increasingly moving money toward so-called microinfluencers — smaller online personalities who have less than 100,000 followers. "They are hiring a bunch of microcreators at scale instead of hiring a handful of macrocreators for what could potentially be the same cost," says Ali Grant, co-chief executive officer of the Digital Department, a creator management company. And they perform where it matters most: engagement. An engagement rate of 3% is considered strong, and some microinfluencers exceed 10%, Grant says of the closely watched metric that tracks how often followers interact with content through likes, comments, shares and saves. Microinfluencers average a 3.2% engagement rate, almost triple the 1.1% rate for macroinfluencers (more than 1 million followers), according to growth marketing agency ATTN... A TikTok partnership with a creator who has around 50,000 followers can run a brand more than $3,500 for a single post, Grant says; with 10 times the followers, that fee might just triple, to around $10,000.... The influencer marketing economy ballooned to a projected $33 billion in 2025 up from $1.7 billion in 2015. The segment gained momentum after the COVID-19 pandemic, as dissatisfaction with traditional work pushed many to reconsider conventional career paths, says Brooke Duffy, a professor of communications at Cornell University. "They realized the trade-offs in terms of the investments of time, energy and human capital were not necessarily worth sacrificing so much of one's personal self for," she says. Success online can bring greater freedom — and even higher pay than many traditional office jobs, which have a median US salary of $69,000, according to Glassdoor. But the middle-class hustle still requires constant effort to maintain. The career has no promise of lifetime longevity. And unlike traditional workers, creators have no predictable paycheck or job protections, making career stability elusive. Roughly 57% of 3,000 surveyed full-time creators earn below a living wage from content creation, according to a report last year from Influencer Marketing Hub. Income from social media can fluctuate wildly from month to month, driven by shifts in algorithms, sponsorship cycles and platform trends. "You could have a month where you make zero dollars, or you could have a month where you make $10,000," Platock says. The article cites Gallup Poll data released last year that found employee engagement in the U.S. had fallen to its lowest level in a decade [with engagement defined as "the psychological attachment workers have to their work/team/employer]. "Among the hardest-hit groups were Generation Z and workers in finance and technology. Broader workplace challenges, including rapid organizational change, hybrid and remote work transitions, and rising employee expectations are considered drivers of the overall trend." "For many workers, influencing can seem like a better deal; flexible schedules and independence wrapped in a veneer of creativity and fun. Almost 60% of Gen Zers say they'd become an influencer if given the opportunity, according to a 2023 survey from Morning Consult."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Variety reports: "The Odyssey" leaks have begun, as a high-quality bootleg of the film reached millions of people on X thanks to a viral tweet on July 25. At 2:25 p.m. PT, a post on X reading "Someone uploaded 'The Odyssey' full movie on X. Can you believe it?" amplified a message from a now-suspended account. The message included a high-quality version of the film, as confirmed by Variety, and climbed to over 2.1 million views within two and a half hours. By that time, the streaming film was replaced by a takedown notice, and then the account was suspended... As of July 26, a few clones of the bootlegged film are available on X, but they've been mostly flooded away by mislabeled files promising "The Odyssey" but actually showing a Rickroll, the longtime internet prank of tricking people into watching the music video for Rick Astley's 1987 song "Never Gonna Give You Up." The article notes the leak "certainly doesn't seem to have hurt the film's still-surging box office in its second weekend, during which it earned another $87 million," or lessened demand for Imax 70 mm tickets.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Thousands of Germans have been threatened with fines or prison sentences for social media posts, reports The Telegraph, calling the country's political speech laws "unusually stringent for an EU member state." One German had his home raided for calling a minister a "Schwachkopf [dummy]" while another was fined €2,000 (£1,700) for calling Friedrich Merz a "lying Fritz" under a law that, critics claim, makes it effectively illegal to make fun of politicians. The number of investigations under Section 86a, the Nazi symbols ban... has more than doubled over the past decade according to official police statistics. Investigations into the "political insult" law also reached record levels in 2025. The surge in cases is so vast that the UN has launched an investigation into free speech violations in Germany, a step typically reserved for dictatorships and banana republics... In one recent case, a pensioner was investigated under Section 188 for posting "Pinocchio is coming" on Facebook, after he learnt Friedrich Merz, the chancellor, was visiting his hometown... The case was dropped after the story caused an outcry in Germany, and police have since clarified that calling the chancellor Pinocchio is not a crime... In November 2024, police in Bavaria raided the home of another pensioner because he called Robert Habeck, the then vice-chancellor of Germany, a "schwachkopf", or dummy. The raid was reportedly launched after Mr Habeck personally filed a criminal complaint against the pensioner. Prosecutors eventually dropped the investigation after deciding that the insult "dummy" was not of "sufficient weight" to merit criminal charges. While such cases might seem like bizarre outliers, there are plenty of others. In 2021, police raided a man's apartment in Hamburg after he told a senator "you're such a d---," and this year a resident was fined €2,000 for calling Mr Merz a "lying Fritz". Official figures show a record 4,792 Section 188 cases were filed in Germany in 2025, with the numbers rising by nearly 85 per cent between 2023 and 2025. The article notes both left- and right-leaning free speech activists in Germany are calling for some of the stricter laws to be scrapped. And it adds that the uproar "bears some similarities to the free speech debate in Britain, where citizens have had a knock on the door from police over opinions posted online."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Version:7.2-rc5 (mainline) Released:2026-07-26 Source:linux-7.2-rc5.tar.gz Patch:full (incremental)

"Welcome home!" NASA posted on X.com, sharing footage of a successful "parachute-assisted" landing on a Kazakhstan steppe for the Soyuz MS-28, carrying three astronauts who'd spent 241 days on the International Space Station. (And YouTube has a full two-hour video with NASA's coverage of the landing.) A NASA web page notes they orbited Earth 3,856 times and traveling more than 102 million miles after docking with the Space Station on November 27. It was the first mission for NASA astronaut Chris Williams and Roscosmos cosmonaut Sergei Mikaev (and the second mission for Roscosmos cosmonaut Sergey Kud-Sverchkov). "After routine post-landing medical checks, recovery teams will fly the crew by helicopter to Karaganda, Kazakhstan. Williams then will board a NASA aircraft bound for the agency's Johnson Space Center in Houston."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

It started with some underground utility work for the South Carolina town of Surfside Beach (population: 4,155). "Public records confirm that a payment of $545,598.30 was issued," according to a local news station — but the CEO of Wildcat Contractors "stated that the account that received the money is a scammer account and that his company has an overdue invoice for underground utility work completed in Surfside Beach." Yahoo picks up the story: After the payment issue surfaced, Wildcat said Surfside Beach sent over the email thread containing the payment confirmation. The company told WMBF it noticed multiple red flags in the chain. One involved an email address where "Wildcat" appeared with an extra "i." Another involved documents that the company said included a forged signature taken from a prior notarized document. Wildcat said the money was sent to a spoofing account claiming to be the contractor. More local reports are unraveling what happened: According to the Wall Street Journal, the town's finance director said a town employee called Wildcat's project manager on March 13, the day the payment was sent. The project manager referred the caller to [Wildcat CEO] Bowker. The town then called Bowker's mobile phone and left a voicemail about the ACH transfer. Bowker told the Wall Street Journal she does not recall the voicemail but acknowledged she may have missed it. Now a new report released by a law firm hired by the town to investigate "shows it did make an attempt to verify before sending $545,000 to a fraudulent bank account," according to local news reports: According to the report, the town sent an email to Wildcat's legitimate email domain on March 13 requesting a callback for verbal verification before sending the payment. Surfside received a response to that email with a phone number, though it remains unclear whether that response came from a real Wildcat employee or from the scammers. The report found that the fake town domain was used in communications between both parties throughout the process, which the law firm overseeing the investigation said was likely created to facilitate the fraud and delay its discovery. That seems to be the case in a nutshell: Investigators determined the fraudsters used spoofed and typo-squatted email domains, including surfsidesbeach.org, to impersonate town officials and redirect the payment. The fraudulent domain was created March 9 and was used to help conceal the scheme, according to investigators. Town officials said they are continuing to work with the FBI, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, and their insurance partners to recover the funds. "The town has also implemented additional security measures to strengthen payment verification procedures and reduce the risk of similar incidents."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

This year, I got to attend GUADEC for the first time ever. For those unfamiliar, GUADEC is a conference usually held in Europe to let GNOME contributors and users from all over the globe to meet up, give talks, hack and get to know each other.

Day 1 §

After a lot of very stressful travelling from the UK to Madrid then to A Coruña (the city where GUADEC is being hosted this year), I finally made it to my hotel on the day of the event, and I got to meet a lot of GNOME contributors at breakfast. This included Allan Day, the current president of the GNOME Foundation, who I found out at the event also lived in the north of England, just a couple of hours from me (potential GNOME Northern UK meet up someday? :D)

Once I arrived at the conference, we had a small introduction talk before the main talks of the day began around 10:20am. The talks today were on a huge variety of cool topics, with some of my highlights of the day being:

• Jakub Steiner’s and Matthias Clasen’s talks about SVG in GTK - Jakub’s talk showed off the new ways these capabilities can be used to build prettier UIs. Matthias’s talk later was about the more technical side of GtkSvg and a few demos. I am very interested in integrating the new SVG capabilities into my own apps.

• A talk about the progress and future plans of Papers, GNOME’s PDF reader and editor, from Markus Göllnitz, Malika Asman and Lucas Baudin (who unfortunately was not able to attend this year). I liked hearing about the accessibility and PDF editing improvements Papers has received/will receive soon. I also want to extend another congratulations to Malika, who has been working on Papers as a Google Summer of Code intern, and now has landed a job at Igalia!

• Sergey Bugaev presenting how he ported a legacy Win32 app used at his day job to modern GTK4 and Flatpak. It was impressive to see how quickly he managed to pull it off, and the new custom GTK widgets that were required, including a very nice alternative to GtkTextView using Scintilla.

Outside the scheduled talks, I also had a lot of great conversations with the other attendees that day. This included discussions about the GNOME core app most dear to my heart, GNOME Calendar - including with Philipp Sauberzweig, our designer and now STF fellow about the design of Calendar, and also Federico Mena Quintero about how I could effectively write strong tests in Calendar, perhaps by rearchitecting some parts of Calendar to use the unidirectional data flow paradigm. I wish more Calendar folks could have attended this year!

I also gave a lightning talk during the community update section at the end of the day! My talk was about the state of the engagement team during the community updates page. I was very nervous for my first talk to all my peers, and unfortunately we forgot to shout out Maria Majadas as a member of the engagement team (sorry again Maria!). On the positive side, a lot of attendees were interested in what our team is doing to help promote our community’s contributions, and did reach out to me during the conference to ask me questions about the engagement team! You can watch my lightning talk here.

To end the first day, some of us got together to have dinner at a nice local Indian restaurant, and enjoy the seaside nearby.

Photo of around 10 GNOME community members sat down eating dinner at a local Indian restaurant, including me second on the left c:

Photo of a small beach at sun set in A Coruña.

Day 2 §

The second day started with me unfortunately missing the first few talks in the morning - I got whisked away by Wim Taymans and Jonas Ådahl to discuss Pipewire and XDG Desktop Portals, and how the two could operate together to provide secure access to audio devices on Linux. I can’t say much for the time being, but I have been hacking on those two modules recently for some paid work I received and I was honored to get to speak to two people who have been in this domain for much longer than me, and very thankful they answered my many questions and gave me lots of advice for my specific area of work on Pipewire/Portals!

I also got to hack on Calendar more with Philipp, including showing off my work on creating a mobile adaptive event details dialog, and Philipp working on improving the look of the event widgets. I had plenty of design feedback to takeaway to work on at home. There is always much to do in Calendar, which is what pulls me to it!

For the talks I did attend on the second day, the highlights included:

• Internationalisation in GNOME by Guillaume Bernard - I am excited to see the internationalisation team grow in GNOME and provide better documentation for us developers! I especially appreciated and 100% agreed with his remark at the start of the talk:

We think of accessibility as just a screen reader for the blind and captions for the deaf - when it is also about making sure software is accessible to those who don’t speak English.

• A demo of the future release of GTK4 Boxes from Felipe Borges - it worked flawlessly, and looks so much better than the decaying GTK3 version, good job Felipe! It was also very funny to see a bunch of Linux evangelists clap at seeing Windows 11 being installed! XD

• Interns Updates Talks - I liked seeing the progress our awesome GSoC interns were up to, and I was lucky to speak to the two interns that could attend in person later at GUADEC. I think one day it could be nice if I mentored someone, it does seem to do a lot of good for the community!

Day 3 §

The day started with the Annual General Meeting talk from a variety of GNOME Foundation members - despite some of the turbulence in the past, the Foundation seems to be in a strong position now to deal with the community’s needs. This includes increasing the number of user donations to the Foundation (to support initiatives like the GNOME Fellowship, and travel sponsorships) - especially around Christmas, the season of giving! It was also interesting to hear plans of moving Flathub away from Github to other forges, among many other exciting things the Foundation plans to do or has done in the past year. While I don’t always agree with the Foundation’s decisions and views, I am very happy to see it is in very good hands with Allan as the president and the new crop of board members - a massive thank you for everyone keeping this show running, you are all awesome!

Photo of Allan Day presenting the monthly donation statistics to the GNOME Foundation for fiscal year 2026.

The AGM was followed up by two talks about GNOME Shell. The first was a general talk on the state of GNOME Shell/Mutter from the core maintainers (including a very happy crowd at the removal of X11!). The second talk by Ivan Molodetskikh was about profiling GNOME Shell with Tracy, and a demo of how to use Tracy in our own C or Rust applications. I followed up with Ivan afterward for advice on using Tracy with Python - the good news it seems possible since Tracy has its own bindings for native Python code, or I could reuse the same strategy to profile PyGObject that he used to profile GNOME Shell’s interaction between the JS UI and the various C libraries it uses.

Photo of Ivan Molodetskikh presenting Tracy's timeline UI at his GUADEC talk

After the talks ended, we all went to have the traditional GUADEC dinner to celebrate the end of the core event. After nearly managing to lose my phone on the bus to the city center and having to take a very impronto sprint to the next bus station to retrieve it, we had a very nice dinner to close off the main part of GUADEC, including a drink of traditional Queimada at the end of dinner - it had a unique taste for an alcoholic drink, and I am glad to have gotten the chance to try it, but it might take some time for my nose hairs to recover from how strong it smelled!

Two pots of Queimada during the phase of burning the alcohol, while someone recites a incantation in the background.

Day 4 §

Day 4 marked the first day of the GUADEC Bird Of a Feathers (BOFs), a series of meetings/workshops for people with a common interest, usually without a focused agenda. I got to attend quite a few on Day 4 and got a lot productive done:

• GNOME Settings - Settings is the other core app besides Calendar I have submitted quite a few patches too, so it was nice to not only meet one of the maintainers, Felipe Borges, in person for the first time, but also a lot of new faces interested in Settings, even a few that ended up submitting patches to Settings afterwards!

  As a group, we discussed Settings AI policy, which was definitely a hard conversation as someone very much against LLMs in general, and what we should do with the CODEOWNERS.md file in Settings, to assign maintainership of specific parts of Settings to people who contribute the most to that specific part. We also showcased many of the cool new features landing for 51/52, including my own sound panel changes for improving the stream rows on mobile for 51 and a microphone test dialog for 52! I also got some helpful feedback for the sound panel while I was there.

• GNOME Mobile - The main issue on the GNOME front seems to be with upstreaming Jonas Dreßler (and others) patches to make GNOME Shell work better on mobile. There was quite a lot of back and forth between the Shell maintainers and Mobile Shell people about what to do with accepting large patch sets to Shell/Mutter when there are only 1-2 maintainers on each upstream project.

  There was a lot discussed, so I won’t try and fully recap here, and will invite you to read the notes for the BOF here. One thing I would like to highlight is a suggestion I made to help ease the burden on the core Shell/Mutter maintainers, by assigning new small merge requests with a “Newcomers can review” label, to encourage new contributors to also become reviewers, like we have done with some success in GNOME Calendar. The GNOME Shell maintainers seemed warm to that idea, so hopefully that idea pans out well :)

After the day was done, some of us went to go watch the World Cup finals in the middle of Plaza de María Pita - I have to admit, while I did not care much about the World Cup coming in, the atmosphere was truly breathtaking when Spain started winning the game, and I had an absolute blast celebrating with everyone who came to watch! I also definitely enjoyed seeing Argentina lose after crushing my home country earlier in the World Cup!

A group of around 10 GNOME foundation members (including me giving a very cheesy smile in the back c:) in middle of Plaza de María Pita, holding a Spanish flag celebrating Spain winning the world cup in a very large crowd.

Day 5 §

After managing to sober up after last night, I attended the Engagement BOF. It was nice seeing so many people of so many backgrounds attend and contribute ideas, feedback and actionable plans to our engagement team. This ranged from how we can onboard more people comfortable drafting posts, or sending their own for us to boost, to translating GNOME’s output to reach a wider audience (thanks Guillaume for bringing many of our internationalisation issues to our attention!), to how we can help the Linux “press” with covering GNOME news. The notes for the Engagement BOF meeting, as well as the notes for all our previous meetings, can be found here

Between the BOFs in the last two days, I also got my first GNOME Shell merge request over the finish line with help of the Shell/Mutter people at GUADEC! Linking back to the GNOME Mobile Shell discussion the previous day, I would also love to start to review Shell patches, so if you need help getting something reviewed, please do ping me in the GNOME Shell Matrix room and I can try to give it a look!

Day 6 §

The last day in Spain was spent relaxing and celebrating with the people who were left - no crazy hacking or talks, just spending the day out with a small pack of other GUADEC attendees, visiting the Torre de Hércule, the oldest lighthouse in the world, walking on the nearby rock beaches, then having lunch at a very nice vegan Mexican restaurant in the city. We also manage to spot a familiar logo on the way to lunch!

Philipp, myself, Guillaume, Charles and Tau in front of a building with a very sandy foot that looks rather similar to the GNOME Logo!

We had a goodbye dinner with the same group I walked the city with, and some others, at a very nice Japanese restaurant near downtown, which while very tasty, we definitely should have listened closer to Maria’s spice warning about the food!

It was very difficult having to say my final goodbyes to everyone I had meet at GUADEC, as I prepared to leave for the UK the next day when I got back to the hotel.

Conclusion + Kudos §

Going to GUADEC this year was a massive privilege and I could not be more thankful to have gone. I cherish every friendship I made, all the people whose work I admired online I finally got to meet in person, and the hundreds of amazing conversation I had with all the people from all backgrounds to learn more about my peers. It was a very good reminder that while working on software from my bedroom in the UK can feel somewhat daunting and lonely, GNOME is all about the amazing people building it too, and behind the software and heated online debates, we have so many amazing developers, designers, translators, hackers, product and infrastructure managers, leaders and users making it all possible!

A huge thank you to the GNOME Foundation for sponsoring my travel to GUADEC - without the funding, I would not have been able to make it to this awesome event and meet my amazing peers in GNOME. Another massive thank you to all the volunteers who helped organize and manage GUADEC, you all rock! If you would like to help ensure the Foundation can continue doing the awesome work it can to organize these events, I ask you make a donation to support the foundation.

I also want to give another massive shout out to our engagement team, especially Maria Majadas, Cassidy James and Victoria Niedzielsk for helping me create frequent and tailored posts on social media to keep the community updated on GUADEC. Y’all helped get the GNOME community hyped about all the cool things happening at GUADEC!

See you all next year, all sooner hopefully!

A Canadian lab has run a chemical process on real spent nuclear fuel "and pulled out 90% of the long-lived danger in 24 hours, the part that forces a burial site to last 100,000 years," notes the blog Autonocio, "with the leftovers meant to fuel a reactor." The standard plan for spent nuclear fuel is to wait it out. You pull the used bundles from a reactor, sit them in a pool of water for seven to ten years while the heat and radiation come down, seal them in concrete casks, and look for somewhere deep and geologically dull to leave them for the next hundred thousand years. Canada has been hunting for that burial site since the 1980s and still doesn't have one in the ground. A company in Saint John, New Brunswick thinks most of what makes that waste dangerous never needed to go in the ground at all. Moltex Energy Canada says a chemical process it calls WATSS can strip 90% of the long-lived material out of used Canada Deuterium Uranium [CANDU] fuel in 24 hours, and that the concentrated leftovers become fuel for a reactor it wants to build on the same site. The recovery step isn't a slide in a pitch deck anymore. In 2025, World Nuclear News reported that Canadian Nuclear Laboratories ran the process on real used fuel from a commercial Canadian reactor and confirmed the 90% figure. None of it is generating power yet. What exists is a validated chemical step and a reactor design waiting in line at a regulator. The rest is a 2030s problem. "The chemistry has a lab result behind it. The reactor does not exist..." the article points out. "Moltex is aiming to have its first WATSS and SSR-W units running at Point Lepreau by the early-to-mid 2030s... Not everyone buys the pitch. Critics have argued the reprocessing creates its own stream of byproducts, that the economics are unproven, and that a single site's stockpile is finite." But Moltex "isn't alone in trying to burn nuclear waste instead of bury it," the article notes, with Switzerland and Denmark "chasing the same goal a different way." Switzerland's Transmutex drives a subcritical reactor with a particle accelerator, feeding it spent fuel alongside thorium... Denmark's Copenhagen Atomics is building a thorium molten-salt reactor that fits inside a shipping container and runs on the leftovers from conventional plants. Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader kwelch007 for sharing the article.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.